On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 02:07:42AM +0100, Christian Kastner wrote: > On 2014-11-23 01:16, Adam Borowski wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 09:09:55PM +0100, Tomasz Buchert wrote: > >> On 10/11/14 10:56, Christian Kastner wrote: > >> I cannot confirm this bug in both cases I've tried: > >> > >> * amd64 (Linux 3.14-2-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.14.15-2 (2014-08-09) x86_64 > >> GNU/Linux) > >> * amrhf (Linux 3.14.4.1-bone-armhf.com #1 SMP Tue Jun 3 12:37:22 UTC > >> 2014 armv7l GNU/Linux) > > > > My tests: > > armhf 3.8.13.28: FTBFS > > Was this either a Debian or a vanilla kernel? I ask because 3.8 kernels > are often vendor-provided variants of certain ARM devices.
I have heard myths of ARM devices that can run upstream kernels, but I have yet to see one :p. This one is git://github.com/hardkernel/linux, a pretty well behaved one as vendor kernels go. (They can go bad. Really bad. Let's not speak about test results on my laptop that needs a 3.0 kernel for which the vendor doesn't even provide source, with a config written by a deranged monkey.) > > amd64 Debian 3.16.3: builds ok > > amd64 vanilla 3.16.7: builds ok > > amd64 vanilla 3.17.3: FTBFS > > I'll try to reproduce the 3.17 FTBFS with Debian's version in > experimental, and the vanilla version. I just tried: Debian experimental 3.17-1 FTBFSes on my machine. -- // If you believe in so-called "intellectual property", please immediately // cease using counterfeit alphabets. Instead, contact the nearest temple // of Amon, whose priests will provide you with scribal services for all // your writing needs, for Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory prices. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
