On 13-12-14 17:40, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Thanks for looking into this. I am already working on a way out of the > mess, which I'll have time to finish up in the next few days.
I saw that pacemaker now got tagged for auto removal as well. I leave it up to you then to fix it either way? > It's worse than this; there appear to be dropped symbols in the library, so > it needs a soname bump (which I'm discussing with upstream, though I'm not > convinced that is going anywhere). > > (That is partly why package managed to migrate, since britney considers > installability but not buildability, and libqb's symbols table is a > complete lie.) Am I missing something? libqb0 does not seem to ship a symbols file, or is that not what you meant with symbols table? > I'm working on a reversion of pacemaker instead, which is better (IMO) than > having to ship without one. That would make Debian a laughing-stock. The > final decision is not mine though, since I have a conflict of interest. Well, looks like it will be messy anyways, as it then should go via T-P-U IIUC. Would it make sense to make yourself owner of these two bugs? Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
