Hi Niels, was src:libjpeg9 ever part of jessie? E.g. should I bump epoch on the upload?
Also do you think I should fill bug on libjpeg9 asking maintainer to rename libjpeg-progs to (f.e.) libjpeg9-progs to have a plan for jessie+1? Sorry it took so long, I almost forgot about this. Cheers, Ondrej On Mon, Feb 23, 2015, at 18:48, Niels Thykier wrote: > Source: libjpeg-turbo > Version: 1:1.3.1-11 > Severity: serious > User: release.debian.org > Usertags: jessie-is-blocker > > Hi, > > It seems that there is no migration from libjpeg-progs to > libjpeg-turbo-progs. Given that we have decided to not ship libjpeg9 > in Jessie (and by extension, libjpeg-progs), this now leaves Wheezy > users with libjpeg-progs installed and no updates to it. This is > unfortunate to say the least. We ought to have caught this earlier - > apologies for not doing so. > > Please provide a migration path from libjpeg-progs to > libjpeg-turbo-progs when upgrading to Jessie. It is my understanding > that libjpeg-progs remains in unstable and you may not be at liberty > to break co-installability between libjpeg62-turbo and libjpeg9 in > unstable. > If this is indeed the case and prevents you from making a proper > upgrade path via unstable, please consider doing it via > testing-proposed-updates. > > Thanks, > ~Niels -- Ondřej Surý <ond...@sury.org> Knot DNS (https://www.knot-dns.cz/) – a high-performance DNS server -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
