Your message dated Fri, 13 Mar 2015 10:17:24 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#780334: please provide normal lib (with SOVERSION) and
lib-dev packages for the libs
has caused the Debian Bug report #780334,
regarding please provide normal lib (with SOVERSION) and lib-dev packages for
the libs
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
780334: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=780334
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: glusterfs-common
Version: 3.5.2-1
Severity: serious
glusterfs-common package embeds the dynamic libraries, the build-time
library links (libfoo.so) and the header all in the same non-numbered
package.
Please split it into, as appropriate, libglusterfs$ABI, libglusterfs-dev,
and glusterfs-common, as all other library-providing packages do in
Debian, see the Policy Manual chapter 8.
While at it, please also enable either symbol versioning (best) or shlibs
file for libglusterfs$ABI package, until it's too late.
Thanks,
/mjt
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
tag #780334 + wontfix
thanks
Am 12.03.2015 um 10:21 schrieb Michael Tokarev:
Package: glusterfs-common
Version: 3.5.2-1
Severity: serious
glusterfs-common package embeds the dynamic libraries, the build-time
library links (libfoo.so) and the header all in the same non-numbered
package.
Please split it into, as appropriate, libglusterfs$ABI, libglusterfs-dev,
and glusterfs-common, as all other library-providing packages do in
Debian, see the Policy Manual chapter 8.
While at it, please also enable either symbol versioning (best) or shlibs
file for libglusterfs$ABI package, until it's too late.
Thanks,
/mjt
Hi,
this was changed with 3.2.1-1, see #630147
Upstream will not follow the standards of the library versioning schema,
so it is not possible to maintain it in this way in Debian. If you need
to build-depend on it, than you have to use the -common package, but
with the changes made in #630147 I also wanted to say (and that is
conform): better do not use this package as b-d.
--
/*
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
Patrick Matthäi
GNU/Linux Debian Developer
Blog: http://www.linux-dev.org/
E-Mail: [email protected]
[email protected]
*/
--- End Message ---
