On Fri, 2015-05-01 05:05:10 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Control: tag -1 - patch
>
> Hi!
>
> On Sun, 2015-04-26 at 12:09:16 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Felix Zielcke wrote:
>>> Just tried out the newest upload of gparted. Which fails completely
>>> The one before which is in jessie works fine.
>>> I.e. 0.19.0-2 without the NMU fix
>>
>> gparted needs a newer udisks2, see #782838. Proposed patch attached.
>
>> diff -Nru gparted-0.19.0/debian/control gparted-0.19.0/debian/control
>> --- gparted-0.19.0/debian/control 2014-06-11 14:50:55.000000000 +0000
>> +++ gparted-0.19.0/debian/control 2015-04-26 16:02:28.000000000 +0000
>> @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
>>
>> Package: gparted
>> Architecture: any
>> -Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
>> +Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, udisks2 (>= 2.1.5-1)
>> Suggests: xfsprogs, reiserfsprogs, reiser4progs, jfsutils, ntfs-3g,
>> dosfstools, mtools, yelp, kpartx, dmraid, dmsetup, gpart
>> Description: GNOME partition editor
>
> As pointed out in #783397 this fix is incorrect. The correct fix is to
> use a Breaks, so that there's no unnecessary Depends introduced.
>
> Thanks,
> GuillemHello Guillem, Just to clarify this. ;) I agree there is no need for an unnecessary dependency. As I can see, gparted doesn't break udisks2. Do you mean to add Breaks: udisks2 (<< 2.1.5) to gparted's debian/control? Regards, Aníbal
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
