On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 12:44:05AM -0330, Lawrence Williams wrote: > Thank you for the report Mr. Simo. I can do a new release if I can find a > sponsor. Would you be willing to help?
FWIW, I have a standing offer of sponsorship for any packages that fix RC bugs, as long as the packages pass my arbitrary limit on extraneous changes unrelated to the RC bugfix. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ > On Sunday 08 January 2006 22:08, Adeodato Simó wrote: > > Package: libsdl1.2 > > Version: 1.2.9-0.0 > > Severity: serious > > > > Hello, > > > > This is a serious bug filed against your package because it > > build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is > > no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from > > source. > > > > [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html > > > > To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and > > substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development > > libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed > > information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. > > > > [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev > > > > As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 > > to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not > > be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from > > testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. > > > > [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg00004.html > > > > The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, > > so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to > > follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of > > affected packages can be found here [4]. > > > > [4] > > http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev > > > > Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not > > be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will > > read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay > > their upload. > > > > Thanks for your collaboration!
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
