Your message dated Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:17:12 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346865: fixed in xskat 4.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:39:38 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:39:38 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62]
helo=chistera.yi.org)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Evm0V-0001Pk-ME
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:39:38 -0800
Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60)
id 1Evlzx-000769-Ma
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:39:01 +0100
From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: xskat: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:39:01 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: xskat
Version: 4.0-1
Severity: serious
Hello,
This is a serious bug filed against your package because it
build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is
no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from
source.
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html
To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and
substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development
libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed
information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2].
[2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev
As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86
to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not
be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from
testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner.
[3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg00004.html
The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge,
so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to
follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of
affected packages can be found here [4].
[4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev
Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not
be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will
read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay
their upload.
Thanks for your collaboration!
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 346865-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jan 2006 23:20:51 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 11 15:20:51 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EwpDM-0006p7-6G; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:17:12 -0800
From: Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#346865: fixed in xskat 4.0-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:17:12 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: xskat
Source-Version: 4.0-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xskat, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
xskat_4.0-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/x/xskat/xskat_4.0-2.diff.gz
xskat_4.0-2.dsc
to pool/main/x/xskat/xskat_4.0-2.dsc
xskat_4.0-2_alpha.deb
to pool/main/x/xskat/xskat_4.0-2_alpha.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated xskat package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:21:01 +0100
Source: xskat
Binary: xskat
Architecture: source alpha
Version: 4.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
xskat - 3-player card game "Skat"
Closes: 346865
Changes:
xskat (4.0-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Build-depend on libx11-dev instead of the obsolete catch-all
xlibs-dev (closes: #346865)
* Bump Standards-Version (nothing to do).
* Debhelper compatibility level 5
Files:
296e34a7d9d2dd10ed21de5d723c0cf2 554 games optional xskat_4.0-2.dsc
a1167db280c58b4e53c23d55a0d2dadc 2859 games optional xskat_4.0-2.diff.gz
a80326d10195ea95252e127d6f93a784 203328 games optional xskat_4.0-2_alpha.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDxY9+04be4mLurYsRAiE8AJsFZiEWtg84Lq3RvMe/8cqmjgfbmgCgpzjv
DdlDg42SZ3+STTohkqPz3aI=
=B6dX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
