On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 11:28:08PM +0900, Youhei SASAKI wrote: > Dear Cédric, > > On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 02:13:15 +0900, > Cédric Boutillier <bou...@debian.org> wrote: > > > > This is affecting packages (build)depending on pry, including > > cucumber. Since ruby-slop has a unique dependency/build-dependency > > (pry) and upstream is not ready yet to upgrade to the v4 of ruby-slop > > (which seems to be a complete rewrite), can we reupload the 3.6.0 > > version, with a 4.2.0+really3.6.0-1 version number in the mean time? > > I need ruby-slop >= version 4 for other project, thus I'll intend to > package named "ruby-slop3". After upload this package, I'll modify pry > depends on ruby-slop3.
herm, since pry seems to be the only reverse dependency, I would instead embed a copy of slop 3 into pry instead of adding a new package. The last time we added this type of versioned package it took a while to get rid of it (ruby-rack1.4). -- Antonio Terceiro <terce...@debian.org>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
