On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Raphael Hertzog <hert...@debian.org> wrote: > On Sat, 05 Sep 2015, Vincent Lefevre wrote: >> My argument is that: >> >> 1. stable must not have security issues, i.e. all security issues >> should be fixed ASAP. AFAIK, security issues in stable are >> generally fixed before unstable. > > No, that's not the general case. And feel free to fix stable. > I fixed unstable because it was the right thing to do given > that I was going to upload something to unstable. >
You are welcomed to "feel free" to fix stable. >> 2. Given (1), if testing version = stable version, it is as easy to >> fix testing. > > This just proves that you don't know how Debian works. A fix for testing > must come via unstable not from stable. > Wonders where is such a rule? >> On the other hand, is it really necessary to have unstable migrate >> to testing right now? > > It's the recommended way to get fixes in testing. > > This is my last answer in this thread because it's getting ridiculous. > Ah, ;-) Cheers, Aron
