Hi all, @ Chris - could you share the relevant bug number where you posted the scripts/patch upstream ?
>From the initial bug you reported " (The scripts have been posted upstream without response, but it is still a distro resposibility to ensure that insta(The scripts have been posted upstream without response, but it is still a distro resposibility to ensure that installations will have safe defaults. Note that the provided udev rules specific to mdadm are only to be included in the mdadm package.) This is at https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=780162#5 Look forward to having that but number so maybe we could also apply some pressure there as well. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A 2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8
