On Tuesday 27 October 2015 21:54:38 Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Hi Lisandro!
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2015 15:30:42 -0300 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
> <perezme...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi everyone! We possibly have two issues here.
> > 
> > The first one is the reported one, which should be fixed.
> > 
> > Now the second one might most probably be because qtx11extras migrated to
> > testing when it shouldn't have. This is the first time it happens for us.
> Doesn't that sound like there's a missing dependency, somewhere?
> It sounds like a person using a testing-unstable mix would also be affected.

Actually libqt5x11extras5 didn't use any new symbols in 5.5.x, so the 
dependencies got fullfiled in testing... and migrated.

We need to ensure to make each qt submodule depend on the version of qtbase it 
was built with (I think we do something very similar for KDE too).


Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to