On 29 March 2016 at 04:11, Alexander Wirt <formo...@debian.org> wrote: > On Mon, 28 Mar 2016, Felipe Sateler wrote: > >> On 5 March 2016 at 19:54, Sam Morris <s...@robots.org.uk> wrote: >> > severity 796611 grave >> > thanks >> > >> > This is currently causing my system to boot without networking. I am >> > increasing the severity since other (rather important!) packages are >> > affected (I assume that I was just lucky until now). >> > >> > I'm currently using the attached unit file to work around the breakage. >> > It's the same as the one I sent in before, but with >> > WantedBy=sysinit.target as advised by Felipe Sateler in the thread >> > above. >> >> I have uploaded an nmu. I have made the unit call out to the init >> script, because it does more work than simply invoking ferm. >> >> Please find attached the debdiff > I find 0-day nmus highly intrusive. Stop that practise.
Current convention as codified in the devref is to upload 0-days for RC bugs over 7 days old. This bug had been open without maintainer input for 6 months (with potential seriousness noted), and has been RC severity due to actual breakage for almost a month. I will not stop NMUing fixes for such bugs. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler
