Your message dated Sun, 22 May 2016 17:24:18 -0500 with message-id <[email protected]> and subject line Re: Bug#805932: libsigc++-2.0-dev: Return-statement with a value, in function returning 'void' has caused the Debian Bug report #805932, regarding libsigc++-2.0-dev: Return-statement with a value, in function returning 'void' to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 805932: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=805932 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: libsigc++-2.0-dev Version: 2.6.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: Causes more than one other package to FTBFS Hi, I currently maintain granule. In the process of C++11 migration, I have come across the following error message: /usr/include/sigc++-2.0/sigc++/adaptors/adaptor_trait.h:256:21: error: return- statement with a value, in function returning 'void' [-fpermissive] { return functor_(); } I had thought that it was a problem with my package, but then I noticed that it was also present in another, unrelated package (#805681), so I think that it might be a problem with libsigc++-2.0-dev. Thanks, Riley -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.2.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages libsigc++-2.0-dev depends on: ii libsigc++-2.0-0v5 2.6.2-1 ii pkg-config 0.29-2 libsigc++-2.0-dev recommends no packages. Versions of packages libsigc++-2.0-dev suggests: pn libsigc++-2.0-doc <none> -- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Not a bug in in libsigc++
--- End Message ---
