On Thu, 2016-06-30 at 08:13 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 01:40:50AM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Sun, 20 Dec 2015 14:17:08 +0100 Julian Andres Klode <jak@debian. > > org> wrote: > > > Package: gnu-efi > > > Severity: serious > > > > > > [This is a reminder for me] > > > > > > The copyright file only lists BSD-3-clause and BSD-4-clause > > > licenses currently. > > > > > > Some parts are BSD-2-clause, though. > > > > > > More importantly, and the reason for the serious severity: > > > > > > Parts of arm and aarch64 code are GPL-2-licensed, though, > > > causing bootloaders built using them to be GPL-2. > > > > So does this just need to be documented, or is it a problem that > > the > > boot loaders have GPLv2 code in them? > > It's fixed in 3.0.4, I just need to upload it :) > > Will do so after breakfast I think. I recently only did APT stuff > and forgot about this :/
Thanks; please also apply the fix for #828887. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings To err is human; to really foul things up requires a computer.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
