On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 10:14:59PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: > > maybe you made a mistake? > Maybe I am wrong, but I remember the time when it was written > out that all dependencies should be written out correctly, > and not via indirect dependencies. I believe you rememeber incorrectly because such a policy doesn't make any sense today and I don't see how it could have been useful in the past.
> In this case, your bug report should go to texlive-htmlxml > which is not installable, and not against tex4ht. I'll leave it to the maintainer of those two packages to sort this out. You surely know better to which package this bug belongs. :) btw, https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/fail/tex4ht_20160814-1.log -- cheers, Holger
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
