control: clone -1 -2 control: retitle -2 "RM [RoQA] attic: unmaintained, RC buggy, replaced by borgbackup
On Wed, 22 Jun 2016 12:13:37 +0200 Gianfranco Costamagna <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Caitlin > On Sun, 08 Nov 2015 19:38:43 -0500 Caitlin Matos <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Please ignore my previous message. I did not read the issue properly. > > The "fix" is actually a commit on another package that someone suggested > > be emulated. > > attic seems dead upstream, this RC bug, a fork that is gaining popcon and > attraction from users, > and in the following months openssl will break the API and this package will > not even build anymore... > Since there is already a fork, well maintained and doing the same stuff as > attic, how do > you feel about contributing there, and ask for removal of this package from > Debian? > > I'm not sure somebody wants to copy fixes from borgbackup to attic, just to > keep it there. > > It will be probably out of Stretch, and I'm not sure if still useful for > Debian at all. > > let me know, > > Gianfranco > as said, please remove attic from the archive, there is no maintainership ongoing according to the almost one year old RC bug with patch on #802619 thanks G.
