On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 08:57:34AM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> A question: Why did you not apply the documentation patch threrby closing bug
> #790664? From the build logs no texi files were processed, how come?

because I could not figure what your patches actually did, and building
without it just worked.
I didn't manually close the bug (that I would have otherwise do) because
I believe that's the maintainer responsability.

I also didn't close #835966 because, well, the package is in mess right
now.

> Furthermore, if you approve to be my sponsor for uploads, I can try to 
> maintain
> that package, thereby also closing #835966?

fine by me :)
Though if you do please start by maintaining it in git somewhere┬╣ with
gbp and do senseful commits, as otherwise I fear whatever you'd do would
be too big to review sanely.
Also keep in mind that I know nothing about ada, nor its policy.


Thank you for your interest!


┬╣ if that Vcs repository is not useful please import all the package
  history by `gbp import-dscs --debsnap`
-- 
regards,
                        Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540      .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org                             : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri                  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to