On my machine this is passing reliably. Given that KVM virtual machine image was mentioned, maybe someone can share KVM image where this is failing? I am still eager to debug this.
On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 4:07 AM, Santiago Vila <sanv...@unex.es> wrote: > > On Fri, 16 Sep 2016, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > >> On 15/09/16 at 19:39 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > >> > Version 2.2.1-0.3 is the first one that does not *always* fail for me. >> > This is a great achievement indeed. >> > >> > Now it builds sometimes, but 3/11 is not a very good ratio. >> >> I'm not sure, no. It's indeed possible that it's still failing randomly. > > Ok, based on available data, this package still FTBFS randomly, so I'm > raising the severity to serious again. > > Since there is a new upstream release, maybe it does not make much > sense to try to debug this in the current version. > > So I suggest the maintainer to disable the tests (trivial but untested > patch attached) for this release and reenable them for the next > upstream version. > > I don't use this package myself, and it is not my intention or desire > to see it autoremoved for the sake of removing it. > > Everything I ask is that it builds ok, so if anybody reading this > wants to see this package in stretch in its current form please consider > contacting the maintainer and/or disabling the tests in a NMU. > > Upstream is willing to help here, but if the maintainer seems to be MIA, > there is not much else we can do. > > Thanks.
