Hi, Tobi, The removal of jade, sp and openjade1.3 is coming along. Openjade1.3 is done, it was actually removed from testing but there were no more dependencies on it. I was focusing recently on the sp binary package, and most of those dependencies have been switched to opensp. Jade is next.
There are tracking bugs already, 811310 and 811312. Aboot and iputils have bugs with patches open to change sp to opensp. Can you explain the output below? I guess "dak rm jade" means remove jade, while the -n means not to actually do it (no act). What does -R mean? Does the command apply to the jade source package or the binary package? I'm guessing source since sp appears in the list and it is a binary package built from the jade source package. Thanks. On 09/25/2016 07:04 AM, Tobias Frost wrote: > Hi Neil, > > how is the removal going? > I was wondering if there should be a dedicated bug to track the status > of the progess? What do you think? > > > A "dak rm -Rn jade" yields to: > > > # Broken Depends: > xmldiff: xmldiff-xmlrev > > # Broken Build-Depends: > aboot: sp > alex: jade > datapacker: jade > dejagnu: jade > gnome-packagekit: sp > gstreamer1.0: jade (>= 1.2.1) > iputils: sp > kannel: jade > libetpan: jade > lprng-doc: jade > mozart: sp > pyepl: jade > scons-doc: jade > > > -- > tobi > > On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 21:00:50 -0400 Neil Roeth <n...@debian.org> wrote: >> I intend to remove this package from Debian rather than update > it. The >> Debian packages openjade/opensp can be used instead. I will file bugs >> against any packages that depend on jade and give them some time to > be >> updated before I file the actual removal bug for jade. >> >> -- >> Neil Roeth >> >> >> -- Neil Roeth
