Hello Luca > This is very unfortunate, but as explained on the mailing list, this > behaviour was an unintentional internal side effect. I didn't quite > realise it was there, and so most other devs.
I understand, I just wanted to point that the synchrotron community invest a lot of efforts in order to provide a tango stack into Debian Stretch. (tango -> pytango -> spyder -> taurus -> hkl -> sardana) It would a big fail for use if Debian stretch were released without tango. > How much work would it be to change tango to avoid relying on aligned > internal recv buffers? I spoke with the tango upstream, and they told me that this change is not that trivial. This is unfortunate that it is so late in the release cycle of Debian. I think that they will not have the time to do this change before the 5 febuary. I will keep you informed if something moves from their part. BUT I beg the zeromq3 maintainer to stick with 4.1.5 for Stetch. Thanks a lot for considering Frederic
