On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 12:47:13AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 11:05:07PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > On 2016-11-28 23:31:38 [+0200], Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > Control: retitle -1 gnubiff: FTBFS due to missing #include <cstring> > > > Control: tags -1 patch fixed-upstream > > > Control: unblock 827061 by -1 > > > > > > I've confirmed that gnubiff builds fine with OpenSSL 1.1 > > > > > > The attached patch cherry-picks the missing cstring includes > > > from 2.2.17 > > > > I have problems following you here. This package depends on openssl and > > links against it. > > Yes. > > > This package does not build as-is against 1.1.0 and a > > binNMU will fail. > > This is not really an OpenSSL issue.
We've been tracking all packages that fail to build that build-depend on libssl-dev, even if they breakage isn't caused by openssl. You can argue about it either way, it's not important for me. Kurt
