On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 09:40:26AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > I'll ask again: Is the purpose of ndiswrapper running non-free drivers? If > it > isn't, show me a free, non-toy, non-POC driver that would prove otherwise.
Does the lack of a free driver which can be used with ndiswrapper mean that it is impossible to use ndiswrapper with such a free driver, should one eventually be written? If there is a brand shiny new file format of which the spec has been fully disclosed and published in an RFC, though no free editors exist (yet) for the format, does that make the format non-free? -- Fun will now commence -- Seven Of Nine, "Ashes to Ashes", stardate 53679.4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]