On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 10:49:53 +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: > Filing the bug against libcrypt-openssl-rsa-perl to make sure it > doesn't enter testing as-is, but the minimal fix is to rebuild > libcrypt-openssl-pkcs10-perl.
Ack. > We probably want some Breaks as well for partial upgrades, > even if they don't directly affect jessie->stretch upgrades > (because perlapi-* dependency makes sure both get upgraded there > in lockstep.) I expect the Breaks are needed on both sides to also > make sure libcrypt-openssl-pkcs10-perl doesn't get updated without > libcrypt-openssl-rsa-perl. Hm, a breaks with a binNUM version sounds at least inelegant. How about: libcrypt-openssl-pkcs10-perl: Depends: libcrypt-openssl-rsa-perl (>= 0.28-4) libcrypt-openssl-rsa-perl: Breaks: libcrypt-openssl-pkcs10-perl (<< 0.16-2) (Probably not "canonical" but should get us closer to safe territory.) Cheers, gregor -- .''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at/ - Debian Developer https://www.debian.org : :' : OpenPGP fingerprint D1E1 316E 93A7 60A8 104D 85FA BB3A 6801 8649 AA06 `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Status Quo: Rockin' All Over The World
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature
