Ximin Luo wrote:
> this particular scheme might not work so well with large archives
> with lots and lots of members
Mm although unlikely to be a serious problem as we aren't iterating
over the directory.
> Also, are you sure this doesn't interfere with the detection of
> order-only differences, or the ability to match up
> similar-member-names?
We still use the archive's member name throughout diffoscope; the
unpacked path shouldn't leak outside of that comparator. Also, the
tests pass… *g*
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` [email protected] / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
