On 09/01/2017 12:57 AM, Alexander Gerasiov wrote: > Hello Julien, > > On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 22:15:04 +0000 > ow...@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) wrote: > >> This bug was not a request for packaging a new upstream version, so >> this changelog entry isn't appropriate. > Could you please explain your point? > > There was several bugs in upstream code which leads to incorrect > behavior on some architectures. > We have fixed them in current upstream code, and current upstream > version was uploaded into archive. This really fixes #867376, you can > see this on https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=uncrustify > What I mean is that when closing bugs in your changelog entry, it should actually describe what fixes the bug. So "New upstream release (closes: #nnn)" implies that #nnn was about packaging a new upstream release. "Fix vanilla flavor to not taste like chocolate (closes: #mmm)" implies that #mmm is about something being wrong with the vanilla flavor of ice cream.
See also https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch06.en.html#bpp-changelog-do Cheers, Julien
