tags 355395 + patch
thanks

> How is this package useful at all, and why is it a -dev package?  It
> contains no binaries, no libraries, and no headers.  

The header files it should contain got lost due to errors in
debian/rules.

The attached patch should fix this (and some lintian/linda
errors/warnings).

> Only a bunch of
> example files and a PDF.  Sounds more like a -doc package, but even
> that would be pretty useless.  If this was not enough to warrant a
> grave bug, an example included doesn't actually compile...

I have not tried that tough, and there's no guarantee that my patch
makes the package look the way the maintainer wants ;-)
 
HTH,
gregor 
-- 
 .''`.   http://info.comodo.priv.at/ | gpg key ID: 0x00F3CFE4
 : :' :  infos zur usenet-hierarchie at.*: http://www.usenet.at/
 `. `'   member of https://www.vibe.at/ | how to reply: http://got.to/quote/
   `-    NP: Shirley Horn: If You Love Me
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- timecode-1.3.orig/debian/compat
+++ timecode-1.3/debian/compat
@@ -1 +1 @@
-4
+5
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- timecode-1.3.orig/debian/dirs
+++ timecode-1.3/debian/dirs
@@ -1,2 +1 @@
-usr/bin
-usr/sbin
+usr/include
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- timecode-1.3.orig/debian/control
+++ timecode-1.3/debian/control
@@ -1,8 +1,9 @@
 Source: timecode
+Section: libdevel
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Matt Flax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0)
-Standards-Version: 3.6.1
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5.0.0)
+Standards-Version: 3.6.2
 
 Package: timecode-dev
 Section: libdevel
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- timecode-1.3.orig/debian/rules
+++ timecode-1.3/debian/rules
@@ -65,8 +65,8 @@
        dh_clean -k 
        dh_installdirs
 
-       # Add here commands to install the package into debian/tmp
-       $(MAKE) install DESTDIR=$(CURDIR)/debian/tmp
+       # Add here commands to install the package into debian/timecode-dev
+       $(MAKE) install DESTDIR=$(CURDIR)/debian/timecode-dev
 
 
 # Build architecture-independent files here.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to