On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 12:48:03PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 12:21:24PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > >> FWIW, last time I asked about this, it was a toolchain bug on armel > >> (std::atomic doesn't work). Is there any other information I should know > >> about? > > It is not true that std::atomic doesn't work on armel, > > and that's not what the error message is about. > > If you can't use something from std:: without linking to an extra library, > it “doesn't work” in my world. :-) Especially given that it used to work just > fine.
armel needing -latomic here is new with gcc 7, but it already used to not work on mips/mipsel and several non-release architectures before. > > The following patch fixes the FTBFS on armel > > and the other architectures where nageru currently FTBFS: > > I'll be happy to include the patch in the next upload, but I do consider it a > workaround (and in particular, I won't be pulling it upstream). My patch is for debian/rules and points to the gcc bug. cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed