> Yeah, unfortunately, mipsel is not the most stable architecture. I am
> not sure what we should do here, we can either agressively retry to
> build on mipsel until all tests pass or alternatively ignore test
> failures. I don't think it would be easy to just ignore them on mipsel,
> so that'd mean we might not catch issues going forward on other arches.
> We do ignore testsuite failures for several other packages, but I think
> it is way better to fail on testsuite failures and to diagnose them. In
> this case, there's probably just not much to diagnose.
> The final alternative would be to remove the previous mipsel binaries so
> the missing build here will not impact chemps2's testing migration.
If it's not too much trouble, I would suggest to retry the build until it