Hi Antonio, Antonio Terceiro <terce...@debian.org> writes:
> Control: forwarded -1 > https://salsa.debian.org/fonts-team/fonts-font-awesome/merge_requests/1 > > On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 06:15:08PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: >> Control: reopen -1 >> >> On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 10:32:38PM +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote: >> > Antonio Terceiro <terce...@debian.org> writes: >> > > 2) revert the changes in fonts-font-awesome in unstable, upload the >> > > new release to experimental, and give people a few months to adapt. >> > >> > I'm okay with this solution. I've currently fixed the broken links and >> > uploaded the fixes. If you would like more time to adapt to the version >> > 5 of font, I can request its removal from unstable and re-upload old >> > version to unstable and then upload this new version to experimental. >> >> There is no such thing as requesting removal. you need to upload it with >> a higher version number, but with the old contents. Something like >> 5.0.10+really4.7.0-1. >> >> Or maybe not. I will try if I can work things out with the new version, >> so expect a few patches. >> >> For now I'm reopening this bug (which was not really fixed by your -3 >> upload), and let's see what I can get. > > So here it is: > https://salsa.debian.org/fonts-team/fonts-font-awesome/merge_requests/1 > > This merge request fixes usage of v5, and add a backwards compatibility > layer for the v4 when used with CSS (which was the only option in v4 > AFAICT). It also adds autopkgtest to automatically test that the needed > files are in the right places both for v5 and for v4. Thanks for this!. I've merged this and pushed new version to unstable. > > LESS and SCSS are not handled. Let's see if any one is really using them, if so we will get bug report. Thanks and Warm Regards, Vasudev --
