On 03/30/2018 05:31 PM, Richard Laager wrote: > If this coordination is acceptable, I believe it solves the various > interactions. I'm happy to test more scenarios if anyone thinks I missed > something. > > If this coordination is not acceptable, I'm open to alternative suggestions.
My current plan is to rename (on the ntpsec side) everything that conflicts. I have a start on this, and it won't be too bad. There will be a different set of trade-offs. -- Richard
