Hi Dominique, I am fine with your suggestion. We will wait for your implementation. Thank you for providing this package!
Kind regards, Felix On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 9:44 AM Dominique Dumont <d...@debian.org> wrote: > > On Monday, 29 October 2018 16:51:45 CET you wrote: > > I am happy to provide patches and merge requests that implement your > > idea, > > Thanks. But the change is trivial. I can do it on my side. > > We just need to find a common ground that allow fixing #905614 > > > but are you sure there are other meaningful consumers of the > > summary_or_text method? > > Absolutely not. But keeping backward compat with already published modules is > one of the best values of the Perl community. I intend to keep that promise as > much as possible > > > Your posting [1] restricts uses to Debian > > Debian and its 100+ derivates. > > > , and > > a search on codesearch.debian.net shows no other packages that rely on > > the current implementation that produces a copyright notice with a > > full text but not with a summary. Why is the current implementation > > worth keeping? > > Because we can't be sure that nobody will be impacted. A user may be relying > on summary_or_text but has not (or will not) publish her or his code. > > > Please forgive me if I appear insistent. It's the only > > question I have. > > No problem. You're right to challenge what is not clear :-) > > All the best > > > >
