On 2018-12-18 18:13, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Hi,
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 8:33 AM Andreas Beckmann <a...@debian.org> wrote:
>
>> Package: znc-backlog
>> Version: 0.20170713-1
>> Severity: serious
>>
>
> Hmm, not sure this is warranted.
It's currently uninstallable in sid.
Instead of requesting a binNMU (and doing so everytime znc changes), I
asked this question here.
>> do you really need a dependency on the exact binary version of znc
>> available at the build time of znc-backlog? I.e., every time znc
>> gets uploaded *or binNMUed*, a binNMU of znc-backlog is needed, too.
>> Wouldn't a dependency computed from the upstream version be sufficient?
>> E.g. znc (>= ${znc:upstreamversion}), znc (<< ${znc:upstreamversion}+)
>>
>>
> I'm using the same as the znc plugins shipped by znc itself. AFAIK, the znc
> ABI is not stable, so backporting an upstream patch could potentially break
> other plugins.
But that's unlikely to happen on binNMUs, isn't it?
> Perhaps znc could Provide: znc-plugin-$somenumber, which could be used by
> out-of-tree plugins? Adding the znc maintainers to the loop for their input
That's being used successfully by some packages ...
Andreas
