Your message dated Wed, 23 Jan 2019 20:15:02 +0200
with message-id <20190123181502.GA32285@localhost>
and subject line Re: Bug#916835: gemma ftbfs on arm64 and mips64el where it 
built before
has caused the Debian Bug report #916835,
regarding gemma ftbfs on arm64 and mips64el where it built before
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
916835: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=916835
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: src:gemma
Version: 0.98.1+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid buster

gemma ftbfs on arm64 and mips64el where it built before (test failures)

arm64:
Ran 12 tests.

FAILED (failures=13)
tail -n 1 dev_test.log | grep -q 'OK'
make[2]: *** [Makefile:231: fast-check] Error 1

mips64el:
Ran 12 tests.

FAILED (failures=2)
tail -n 1 test.log | grep -q  'OK' test.log
make[2]: *** [Makefile:236: slow-check] Error 1

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 10:29:26AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: src:gemma
> Version: 0.98.1+dfsg-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid buster
> 
> gemma ftbfs on arm64 and mips64el where it built before (test failures)
>...

Whatever caused this problem seems to be fixed elsewhere now:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gemma

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to