Quoting Sébastien Delafond (2019-01-31 09:08:38) > To me the straightforward solution here is not dpkg-alternative, but > what Ivo recommended, since it only involves modifying *one* package.
The underlying issue is that the "js" in python-jsbeautifier stands for JavaScript, and python-jsbeautifier fail to properly expose the JavaScript part of the project as a shared library! The straightforward solution is for python-jsbeautifier to also build libjs-beautify and node-beautify! - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
