On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 11:11:38AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Adrian,
Hi Andreas, > On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 09:57:01AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > > > Indeed, with this pbbam now passes its autopkgtests on all three > > > architectures in Ubuntu. Attached is a complete patch against pbbam > > > 0.19.0+dfsg-3 for this. > > > > Thanks, I've done NMUs for both this problem and removal of the libpbbam > > provides that caused FTBFS of blasr and pbdagcon. > > > > debdiffs are attached. > > Thanks a lot for your NMUs and the service to attach debdiffs. I > updated the according Git repositories on Salsa. Since there was a race > condition of mails I've uploaded pbbam with (basically) the same changes > as you did. I injected your changelog entry anyway in Git. > Unfortunately when I look at pbbam build logs[1] it seems bug #909071 > can not be considered as solved. :-( > BTW, I previously tried to spent some time into the i386 port but with > no result. :-( #909071 is resolved since pbbam built on amd64/arm64/ppc64el/mips64el. i386 FTBFS is part of #829741, and 32bit and big endian failures are not relevant for testing migration since there are no older binaries for these architectures in the archive. > Regarding your NMUs: You've sent also debdiffs for blasr_5.3.2+dfsg-1.1 > and pbdagcon_0.3+git20161121.0000000+ds-1.1 but I have not seen any > upload of these. I've commited the debdiffs in Git. I'm just waiting > whether I see some uploads but feel free to ping me whether I should > "sponsor" your changes. They are now uploaded, I had to wait with uploading until the pbbam provides fix was built on mips64el so that they won't FTBFS again due to that. > Thanks again for all your contribution > > Andreas. cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed