Control: tags -1 help moreinfo Hi,
I really wonder why gatb-core should be missing. According to tracker[1] gatb-core is in testing and the build logs[2] are specifying exactly those architectures as successfully installed that you claim missing (in agreement with discosnp tracker page[3] admittedly but not more enlightening to me). Any idea what might be wrong here and how to fix this? Kind regards Andreas. [1] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/gatb-core [2] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gatb-core [3] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/discosnp On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 12:48:07PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > Package: src:discosnp > Version: 2.3.0-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: sid buster > > Impossible Depends: discosnp -> gatb-core/amd64 > Impossible Depends: discosnp -> gatb-core/arm64 > Impossible Depends: discosnp -> gatb-core/i386 > Impossible Depends: discosnp -> gatb-core/mips64el > Impossible Depends: discosnp -> gatb-core/ppc64el > Impossible Depends: discosnp -> gatb-core/s390x > > _______________________________________________ > Debian-med-packaging mailing list > debian-med-packag...@alioth-lists.debian.net > https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-med-packaging -- http://fam-tille.de