Rob Browning <r...@defaultvalue.org> writes: > Rob Browning <r...@defaultvalue.org> writes: > >> Yep -- I'm not sure yet, but I may lean toward providing: >> >> bin/guile -> ./guile-2.2 # or whatever the selected alternative is >> bin/guild -> ./guild-2.2 # or whatever the selected alternative is > > OK, I think I'll have an upload this weekend using the built in > ./configure --program-suffix support. That produces a nearly identical > install tree (though I'll need to double check the debs), excepting > changes that should solve our problems, i.e. it installs:
Uploaded 2.2.4+1-2 to sid: https://salsa.debian.org/rlb/deb-guile/commits/deb/guile-2.2/v/2.2.4+1-2 Which includes: commit 4885ac01ce33474021b51695ef896661f237bd40 Author: Rob Browning <r...@defaultvalue.org> Date: Sat Jun 1 13:20:41 2019 -0500 Handle guile-config/guile-snarf/guild as alternatives Arrange for guile-config, guile-snarf, guild (and guile-tools) to be handled via update-alternatives with all of the other tools dependent on guile-config. Configure with "--program-suffix -2.2" which gives the binaries the correct names from the start, so that we don't have to manually change them in debian/rules. This also arranges for guile-config, etc. to refer to the versioned guile in their #! lines, which is what we should have been doing all along. Thanks to Ahmed El-Mahmoudy and Norbert Preining for reporting the problem, Kari Pahula and Vagrant Cascadian for help devising the fix, and Thibaut Paumard for help testing. Closes: 926182 I also included an upstream fix for the popen.test failures which I'd begun hitting on amd64 too. I'll see about badgering the release team if it the buildds like it, but feel free to ping me if I wander off. Thanks for all the help -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
