On 2019-09-08 16:28:52, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Version: 0.0.20190905-1
>
> Over in 849...@bugs.debian.org, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> I do plan for putting wireguard into buster-backports, since i expect
>> the upstream inclusion issues to be resolved one way or another by the
>> time of bullseye release.  If anyone wants to help out by adding it to
>> stretch-backports-sloppy, i would welcome that.
>
> Following up on this, and after some discussion with Jason (upstream), i
> think it's time to let wireguard migrate into debian testing.
>
> So i'm closing #849308 with this e-mail, and once wireguard migrates
> into testing, i'll look into putting it into buster-backports.
>
> I welcome anyone who wants to contribute to the debian packaging to
> offer maintenance help too!

Awesome news, thanks everyone!

A.

PS: does that mean anything regarding WG's inclusion into mainline? I
haven't followed LKML recently so I don't know if that closer to
realization... Or is this just a (vague, non-binding) promise that the
protocol won't change as much anymore?

-- 
À force de ne jamais réfléchir, on a un bonheur stupide
                        - Jean Cocteau

Reply via email to