> > > > Do you have plans/solutions regarding this issue? Is it possible
> > > > to drop uwsgi-core dependency on libmatheval1?
> > >
> > > It should be as simple as not building the matheval plugin which is
> > > not critical to uwsgi. Should I go on with this?
> >
> > Yeah, I just wasn't sure that it'd be an acceptable solution for you.
> >
> > But it's perfectly fine with me. :)
>
> Well, I would say "tolerable" rather than "acceptable" - it is a real
> annoyance since it will directly remove features now offered in uwsgi.
upstream says in 1.9.20 changelog:
The matheval support has been removed, while a generic “matheval” plugin
(for internal routing) is available (but not compiled in by default).
See below for the new way for making “math” in config files.
> @Alexandre: Make sure to add a NEWS entry warning users of the removal
> of matheval - ideally enumerating explicitly all uwsgi options which has
> disappeared and may silently wreak havoc on local systems.
>
> Also, better check e.g. with codesearch.debian.net if any packages rely
> on matheval-related uwsgi config options, and if so alert them with
> bugreports.
Search on "uwsgi matheval" or "uwsgi math" yields no result.
Thanks,
Alex
