Francesco Paolo Lovergine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi,
>> Huh? It's a IPv6 address, followed by a slash, followed by the number >> of significant bits in decimal. Just like IPv4. > > Sorry, that's not what I meant. > > ::ffff:192.168.0.0/124 is correct, ::ffff:192.168.0.0/24 not. > because the second address is a mixed ipv4-in-ipv6 spec, but must > specify the whole 128 bit range, not the ipv4 form. Ah, ok, now it makes sense to reject that, indeed. As long as regular IPv4 CIDR is supported :) Thanks, JB. -- Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian, because code matters more Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | <http://www.debian.org> Public key available on <http://www.jblache.org> - KeyID: F5D6 5169 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
