On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 09:29:20PM -0400, Neil Roeth wrote: > On May 9, Chris Waters ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Hmm, it seems to be complaining that it can't find anything to use as > > a Helvetica font for that document. What happens if you do: > > > > xlsfont | grep -i helvetica
> Thanks for looking into this. Here's the requested output: > -adobe-helvetica-bold-o-normal--0-0-100-100-p-0-iso10646-1 > -adobe-helvetica-bold-o-normal--0-0-100-100-p-0-iso10646-1 > -adobe-helvetica-bold-o-normal--0-0-100-100-p-0-iso8859-1 > -adobe-helvetica-bold-o-normal--0-0-100-100-p-0-iso8859-1 <snip> > The major font-related thing I did recently was switching to the new X11R7 > scheme where all fonts are in /usr/share/fonts/X11 rather than > /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts. Is there any chance that bug #365403 is relevant to this case? Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
