On Sun, Sep 08, 2019 at 03:31:29AM +0800, Tz-Huan Huang wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 4:39 AM Moritz Mühlenhoff <j...@inutil.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 11:09:36PM +0200, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez
> > Meyer wrote:
> > > Source: scim
> > >
> > > Hi! As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4
> > > as [announced] in:
> > >
> > > [announced] <
> > https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2017/08/msg00006.html>
> > >
> > > Currently Qt4 has been dead upstream and we are starting to have problems
> > > maintaining it, like for example in the [OpenSSL 1.1 support] case.
> > >
> > > [OpenSSL 1.1 support] <
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=828522>
> > >
> > > In order to make this move, all packages directly or indirectly
> > depending on
> > > the Qt4 libraries have to either get ported to Qt5 or eventually get
> > > removed from the Debian repositories.
> > >
> > > Therefore, please take the time and:
> > > - contact your upstream (if existing) and ask about the state of a Qt5
> > > port of your application
> > > - if there are no activities regarding porting, investigate whether
> > there are
> > > suitable alternatives for your users
> > > - if there is a Qt5 port that is not yet packaged, consider packaging it
> > > - if both the Qt4 and the Qt5 versions already coexist in the Debian
> > > archives, consider removing the Qt4 version
> >
> > Given upstream's comments on https://github.com/scim-im/scim/issues/21,
> > let's
> > move forward by dropping the scim-qt-immodule binary package? It can still
> > be re-added if a Qt5 port appears at a later time.
> >
> 
> Sure. I have made the update and been waiting for maintainer's review.
> 
>   https://github.com/leggewie-DM/scim/pull/1

Hi Rolf,
could you have a look/do an upload? Once the qscintilla migration is complete,
scim will be the last remaining key package blocking the removal of Qt4
from testing.

Cheers,
        Moritz

Reply via email to