Control: forwarded -1 aspectc-develop...@aspectc.org Hi Adrian,
Olaf, the upstream developer, has a question regarding your patch to aspectc++. Would you mind having a look and ideally sharing your reply to everyone? Thank you! -rt On 3/17/20 11:05 AM, Olaf Spinczyk wrote: > Hi Reinhard! > > Do you understand the reasons behind the patch? > > The difference is the following addition for linking: > > -Wl,--as-needed -latomic -Wl,--no-as-needed > > (1) I wonder why the atomics (e.g. __atomic_fetch_add_4) are not > available by default in armel. They seem to be on most other platforms. > > (2) Why is "--as-needed ... --no-as-needed" necessary? > > (3) Could -latomic also be placed at the end of the list of libraries > (behind the additional libraries needed for Clang 9.0.x)? > > Cheers, > > Olaf > > Am 17.03.20 um 14:10 schrieb Reinhard Tartler: >> Hi aspect c++ developers, >> >> Would the attached patch be acceptable for svn trunk? >> >> Please have a look at the Debian bug for context. I'm happy to clarify any >> questions. >> >> Best >> Rt >> >> >> -------- Original Message -------- >> From: Adrian Bunk <b...@debian.org> >> Sent: March 17, 2020 7:04:58 AM EDT >> To: Ivo De Decker <iv...@debian.org>, 953...@bugs.debian.org >> Subject: Bug#953540: aspectc++: FTBFS on armel >> >> Control: tags -1 patch >> >> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 11:12:16AM +0000, Ivo De Decker wrote: >>> package: src:aspectc++ >>> version: 1:2.2+git20200229-1 >>> severity: serious >>> tags: ftbfs >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> The latest upload of aspectc++ to unstable fails on armel: >>> >>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=aspectc%2B%2B >> >> Fix attached. >> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Ivo >> >> cu >> Adrian >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aspectc-developers mailing list >> aspectc-develop...@aspectc.org >> http://aspectc.org/listinfo/aspectc-developers >> > _______________________________________________ > aspectc-developers mailing list > aspectc-develop...@aspectc.org > http://aspectc.org/listinfo/aspectc-developers >