Control: forwarded -1 aspectc-develop...@aspectc.org

Hi Adrian,

Olaf, the upstream developer, has a question regarding your patch to aspectc++.
Would you mind having a look and ideally sharing your reply to everyone?

Thank you!
-rt

On 3/17/20 11:05 AM, Olaf Spinczyk wrote:
> Hi Reinhard!
> 
> Do you understand the reasons behind the patch?
> 
> The difference is the following addition for linking:
> 
>  -Wl,--as-needed -latomic -Wl,--no-as-needed
> 
> (1) I wonder why the atomics (e.g. __atomic_fetch_add_4) are not
> available by default in armel. They seem to be on most other platforms.
> 
> (2) Why is "--as-needed ... --no-as-needed" necessary?
> 
> (3) Could -latomic also be placed at the end of the list of libraries
> (behind the additional libraries needed for Clang 9.0.x)?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Olaf
> 
> Am 17.03.20 um 14:10 schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
>> Hi aspect c++ developers,
>>
>> Would the attached patch be acceptable for svn trunk?
>>
>> Please have a look at the Debian bug for context. I'm happy to clarify any 
>> questions.
>>
>> Best
>> Rt
>>
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> From: Adrian Bunk <b...@debian.org>
>> Sent: March 17, 2020 7:04:58 AM EDT
>> To: Ivo De Decker <iv...@debian.org>, 953...@bugs.debian.org
>> Subject: Bug#953540: aspectc++: FTBFS on armel
>>
>> Control: tags -1 patch
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 11:12:16AM +0000, Ivo De Decker wrote:
>>> package: src:aspectc++
>>> version: 1:2.2+git20200229-1
>>> severity: serious
>>> tags: ftbfs
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The latest upload of aspectc++ to unstable fails on armel:
>>>
>>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=aspectc%2B%2B
>>
>> Fix attached.
>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Ivo
>>
>> cu
>> Adrian
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aspectc-developers mailing list
>> aspectc-develop...@aspectc.org
>> http://aspectc.org/listinfo/aspectc-developers
>>
> _______________________________________________
> aspectc-developers mailing list
> aspectc-develop...@aspectc.org
> http://aspectc.org/listinfo/aspectc-developers
> 

Reply via email to