On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 02:49:40PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: ant-contrib > Version: 1.0~b3+svn177-11 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS on amd64 > Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs > Usertags: ftbfs-20200322 ftbfs-bullseye > > Hi, > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build > on amd64. > > Relevant part (hopefully): > > (snip)
Thank you for the bug report Lucas. It looks like there are interface changes in the recent update of bcel from 6.3 to 6.4.1 [1]. > > [junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Should throw > > BuildException because 'Design is broken' with message 'Design check failed > > due to previous errors' (actual message > > 'org.apache.bcel.classfile.ClassFormatException: Invalid method signature: > > Ljava/lang/String;' instead) > > [junit] at > > net.sf.antcontrib.design.VerifyDesignTest.expectDesignCheckFailure(VerifyDesignTest.java:349) > > [junit] /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/test/resources/design/verifydesign.xml:64: > > org.apache.bcel.classfile.ClassFormatException: Invalid method signature: > > Lmod/arraydepend2/ClassDependsOnArray; > > [junit] at > > net.sf.antcontrib.design.VerifyDesignTest.testArrayDepend2(VerifyDesignTest.java:74) We will need to either put together a patch for bcel or for ant-contrib. Cheers, tony [1] https://tracker.debian.org/news/1104326/accepted-bcel-641-1-source-into-unstable/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
