Your message dated Wed, 5 Aug 2020 12:36:41 +0200
with message-id <a23d8eff-56ca-6f3a-2211-44fbdb6b7...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#967209: rgtk2: Unversioned Python removal in
sid/bullseye
has caused the Debian Bug report #967209,
regarding rgtk2: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
967209: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=967209
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: src:rgtk2
Version: 2.20.36-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: py2unversioned
Python2 becomes end-of-live upstream, and Debian aims to remove
Python2 from the distribution, as discussed in
https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2019/07/msg00080.html
We will keep some Python2 package as discussed in
https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2020/07/msg00039.html
but removing the unversioned python packages python-minimal, python,
python-dev, python-dbg, python-doc.
Your package either build-depends, depends on one of those packages.
Please either convert these packages to Python3, or if that is not
possible, replaces the dependencies on the unversioned Python
packages with one of the python2 dependencies (python2, python2-dev,
python2-dbg, python2-doc).
Please check for dependencies, build dependencies AND autopkg tests.
If there are questions, please refer to the wiki page for the removal:
https://wiki.debian.org/Python/2Removal, or ask for help on IRC
#debian-python, or the debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org mailing list.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
fixed libglade2 is now in the archive.
On 8/4/20 3:16 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 4 August 2020 at 15:06, Matthias Klose wrote:
> | block 967209 by 967157
> | thanks
> |
> | sorry, that's due to uninstallability of libglade2-dev.
>
> Thanks, that makes sense.
>
> (And thanks also to Julien, that was a good idea too but it does come up
> negative:
>
> edd@rob:~/deb/rgtk2(master)$ grep -ri Python
> inst/doc/tutorial.sgml:bindings for many other languages including C, C++,
> Guile, Perl, Python,
> edd@rob:~/deb/rgtk2(master)$
>
> Dirk
>
> | On 8/4/20 2:49 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> | >
> | > Hi doko and Python folks,
> | >
> | > On 4 August 2020 at 09:29, Matthias Klose wrote:
> | > | Package: src:rgtk2
> | > | Version: 2.20.36-2
> | > | Severity: serious
> | > | Tags: sid bullseye
> | > | User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
> | > | Usertags: py2unversioned
> | > |
> | > | Python2 becomes end-of-live upstream, and Debian aims to remove
> | > | Python2 from the distribution, as discussed in
> | > | https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2019/07/msg00080.html
> | > |
> | > | We will keep some Python2 package as discussed in
> | > | https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2020/07/msg00039.html
> | > | but removing the unversioned python packages python-minimal, python,
> | > | python-dev, python-dbg, python-doc.
> | > |
> | > | Your package either build-depends, depends on one of those packages.
> | > | Please either convert these packages to Python3, or if that is not
> | > | possible, replaces the dependencies on the unversioned Python
> | > | packages with one of the python2 dependencies (python2, python2-dev,
> | > | python2-dbg, python2-doc).
> | > |
> | > | Please check for dependencies, build dependencies AND autopkg tests.
> | >
> | > I am lost.
> | >
> | > Build-Depends:
> | > Source: rgtk2
> | > Section: gnu-r
> | > Priority: optional
> | > Maintainer: Dirk Eddelbuettel <e...@debian.org>
> | > Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 10), dh-r (>= 20180615), r-base-dev (>=
> 3.6.1), libgtk2.0-dev (>= 2.10.12), libglade2-dev, libpango1.0-dev,
> libcairo2-dev
> | > Standards-Version: 4.4.0
> | > Vcs-Browser: https://salsa.debian.org/edd/r-cran-rgtk2
> | > Vcs-Git: https://salsa.debian.org/edd/r-cran-rgtk2.git
> | > Homepage: https://cran.r-project.org/package=RGtk2
> | >
> | > Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 10), dh-r (>= 20180615), r-base-dev (>=
> 3.6.1), libgtk2.0-dev (>= 2.10.12), libglade2-dev, libpango1.0-dev,
> libcairo2-dev
> | >
> | > Depends:
> | > Package: r-cran-rgtk2
> | > Source: rgtk2 (2.20.36-2)
> | > Version: 2.20.36-2+b1
> | > Installed-Size: 18722
> | > Maintainer: Dirk Eddelbuettel <e...@debian.org>
> | > Architecture: amd64
> | > Depends: r-base-core (>= 4.0.0-3), r-api-4.0, libatk1.0-0 (>= 1.12.4),
> libc6 (>= 2.14), libcairo2 (>= 1.8.0), libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 (>= 2.22.0),
> libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.41.1), libgtk2.0-0 (>= 2.20.0), libpango-1.0-0 (>=
> 1.25.5), libpangocairo-1.0-0 (>= 1.22.0)
> | > Description-en: GNU R binding for Gtk2
> | > [...]
> | >
> | > Where is python coming in from, and what could I change? Is it libglade2
> ?
> | >
> | > If we cannot change and must remove it that would be, I guess, defensible.
> | > The package and the related ones are a little end-of-life-ish, but have
> not
> | > yet been removed from CRAN either so there is need for imminent action for
> | > removal. We could remove it but that is likely to annoy a user or two, and
> | > "as users are our priority" I suggest to keep it ... but I need a helping
> | > hand here.
> | >
> | > | If there are questions, please refer to the wiki page for the removal:
> | > | https://wiki.debian.org/Python/2Removal, or ask for help on IRC
> | > | #debian-python, or the debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org mailing list.
> | >
> | > d-p CC'ed.
> | >
> | > Thanks, Dirk
> | >
> |
>
--- End Message ---
