Le 22/09/2020 à 13:10, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Quoting Pirate Praveen (2020-09-22 13:03:53) >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 11:53, Jonas Smedegaard <jo...@jones.dk> wrote: >>> If you simply mean a loose "don't break reverse dependencies!" and >>> write some suggestions down on a wiki page, then I fully agree: That >>> is common for Debian in general. What might be notable about >>> node.js is the likelyhood of complying with semantic versioning, and >>> it might be helpful to emphasize that in this team. >> >> I have started a wiki page by copying from ruby teams policy at >> https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/Transitions/Policy >> >> Please go through and suggest if we need to change anything. >> >>> If you propose a formal screening process, then I am sceptical both >>> how to practically enforce that and whether it is the right >>> approach. >> >> ok, lets start with documenting our expectation and forget this option >> for now. If we see a lot of uploads not following the policy, we can >> think about this or other options later. > > Current wiki text looks fine to me. > > Thanks for driving this! > > - Jonas
Looks good to me too. We could perhaps list the "bigger transitions" (nodejs, babel, bubble, rollup) Thanks !