Your message dated Fri, 16 Oct 2020 14:00:43 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#939324: elixir: cannot be installed without Erlang
from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #939324,
regarding elixir: cannot be installed without Erlang from unstable
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
939324: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=939324
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: elixir
Version: 1.9.1.dfsg-1~bpo10+1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I tried installing elixir 1.9.1.dfsg-1~bpo10+1 from buster-backports.
Apt marked it broken and told me to upgrade erlang-base to a version
only available in unstable, even though installed version seemed to
match the requirement.
I think it may have something to do with #930497 because non-backports
elixir 1.7.4-0.1 depends on
erlang-base (>= 1:19) | erlang-base-hipe (>= 1:19),
while elixir 1.9.1.dfsg-1~bpo10+1 depends on
erlang-base:any (>= 1:20) | erlang-base-hipe:any (>= 1:20)
and it seems buster versions of erlang don't have Multi-Arch: allowed.
I'm not familiar enough with Debian packaging to try and suggest a fix.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.0
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (700, 'stable'), (600, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable-updates')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-5-amd64 (SMP w/6 CPU cores)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE,
TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8),
LANGUAGE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 03:55:49PM +0200, Baptiste Beauplat wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + patch
> Control: severity -1 grave
Note that this kind of thing is filed under "serious" not "grave" (even
if at the end of the day they are pretty much the same)
> On Tue, 03 Sep 2019 13:40:41 +0200 Michal Sidor
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I tried installing elixir 1.9.1.dfsg-1~bpo10+1 from buster-backports.
> > Apt marked it broken and told me to upgrade erlang-base to a version
> > only available in unstable, even though installed version seemed to
> > match the requirement.
>
> I've bump the severity as this bug actually makes the package uninstallable.
>
> I have prepared an NMU for elixir-lang (versioned as
> 1.9.1.dfsg-1~bpo10+2). As I'm not a DD, I will be asking for my sponsor
> (mattia, as CC'ed) to upload it for me to a DELAYED queue. Please feel
> free to tell us if that NMU should be canceled/delayed.
Since Evgeny gave his ACK, I'm uploading it directly.
Note that uploads to backports do not close bugs, so I'm closing this
bug manually now.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
