Hi,

On 26/10/20 at 11:19 +0100, Baptiste Jonglez wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 12:32:34 +0200 "Aaron Zauner (azet)" <a...@azet.org> 
> wrote:
> > If anyone wants to take over I'm more than fine with that. The amount of 
> > work I have at the moment barely permits me from maintaining projects. It's 
> > most sensible that someone actively using this project on Debian maintains 
> > it, as is, I'm not using it much anymore and am not working in HPC at the 
> > moment. The bug should definitely reported upstream. Upgrading the package 
> > should be fairly simple though - the dependencies are already in place, as 
> > are simple tests/git integration etc.: https://github.com/azet/lmod-deb
> 
> I had a look, and it seems to be an upstream "feature" that was introduced
> between lmod 6.2 and lmod 6.3.
> 
> The root cause is that the configure script uses the build-time paths from
> lua, and then uses these paths at runtime.  The upstream changelog for 6.3
> states:
> 
> > Lmod now uses the values of LUA_PATH and LUA_CPATH at configuration
> > time.  This way Lmod is safe from user changes to these important Lua
> > values.
> 
> The corresponding upstream change and discussion: 
> https://github.com/TACC/Lmod/issues/112
> 
> This was already reported for ARM and closed: 
> https://github.com/TACC/Lmod/issues/338
> 
> Overall, I think the simplest solution is to change the architecture to "any".

Thanks Baptiste for the investigation.
I've just uploaded an NMU to unstable, and will also upload a fix to
stable.

I also opened an RFA bug for this package to reflect the current
situation (#972938).

- Lucas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to