Control: retitle -1 timestamp too far in the past
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 08:54:48AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> ----- Forwarded message from Debian FTP Masters
> <ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org> -----
> To: mips64el Build Daemon <buildd_mips64el-mipsel-osuosl...@buildd.debian.org>
Good forward. Yes, that is a compliment
> Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2020 01:51:38 +0000
> Subject: rust-csv_1.1.5-1_mips64el-buildd.changes REJECTED
> Message-Id: <e1kl0g2-0002tk...@fasolo.debian.org>
>
> librust-csv-dev_1.1.5-1_mips64el.deb: has 66 file(s) with a timestamp too far
> in the past:
> usr/share/cargo/registry/csv-1.1.5/.gitignore (Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970)
> usr/share/cargo/registry/csv-1.1.5/COPYING (Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970)
> usr/share/cargo/registry/csv-1.1.5/ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md (Thu Jan 1 00:00:00
> 1970)
...
> usr/share/cargo/registry/csv-1.1.5/src/tutorial.rs (Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970)
> usr/share/cargo/registry/csv-1.1.5/src/writer.rs (Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970)
> usr/share/cargo/registry/csv-1.1.5/tests/tests.rs (Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970)
> ----- End forwarded message -----
In the build for arm64,
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=rust-csv&arch=arm64&ver=1.1.5-1&stamp=1607044951&raw=0
lots of the same "1970-01-01 00:00"
FWIW I agree with the mips64el buildd to report this
too far in the past in the past time stamp.
Regards
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
