"Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> The attached patch moves the backup partition table one sector further out;
> based on your analysis I'm fairly sure this is the right thing to do, but I
> have zero experience with both parted code and GPT partitions, so I'd
> appreciate if somebody could review it.

I am not qualified to review it.  Anyway, I'd prefer having some
assertions in place to make sure that nothing overlaps in a fresh
GPT disklabel.  (However, I wouldn't dare add such assertions to
places where *existing* disklabels are processed, unless I first
checked the EFI specification.)

Attachment: pgpE9coCE5fdE.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to